Women
are gaining increasing ground in politics, but Italy
is hanging behind, compared to the rest of the world.
Feminists throughout the world cherish
the dream that in 2008 Hillary Rodham Clinton will
stand for elections for the Democratic Party in the
United States and that Condoleezza Rice will stand
for the Republican Party. This dream is all but impossible,
considering that the former president's wife, who
is today a powerful senator of the State of New York,
is leading the left wing electorate's list of favourites
and that the current Secretary of State is deemed
the most balanced and intelligent interpreter of Neoconservative
thought in America. If the hope should concretise,
it would be a double revolution, an event charged
with a global impact and bound to deeply influence
political trends in at least half the countries in
the world. In fact so far no woman has ever run for
the White House for one of the two leading parties;
if then there are two of them to guarantee that however
things turn out the world's superpower will be guided
by a woman's hand for the next four years, we would
have reached a crucial turning point. It has so far
only been theorised by a TV serial in the United States
with Geena Davies playing the president (to be frank,
it met with very little success). Our almost daily
controversies on the pink quota and the feasibility
of legally introducing it would even take on a retro
flavour. The topic of women in politics is certainly
not new: without tracing history's leading female
figures - Isabella the Catholic, Maria Theresa of
Austria and Catherine of Russia, who on the other
hand did not rise to power through votes but by succession
rights - suffice it to think that in the latter half
of the last century we had Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir
and especially Margaret Thatcher. However during this
first glimpse of the new millennium the debate has
taken on a more pressing pace and it has especially
recorded a series of important novelties both in western
industrialised nations and in parts of the world like
Latin America, where machismo still prevails. The
proportion of female Members of Parliament in the
various Parliaments has gradually increased and the
awareness that women are more balanced and have more
mediation skills than their male colleagues in many
public sectors is taking root. It is no mere chance
that while the world is still packed with male dictators,
we never hear of "female dictators".
| 
|
| Condoleezza Rice |
Considering recent events, the most significant one
that is charged with consequences is doubtless Angela
Merkel's election as Chancellor of the German Federal
Republic, especially at a time in which Europe suffers
a lack of leadership; hence reaching the top of its
richest and most populated country has enabled the
former Professor of Physics of Eastern Germany to
immediately play a leading role. Mrs. Merkel had to
push her way through a swarm of male rivals to emerge
in a country, whose southern catholic region, in particular,
still associates women with the 3K formula Kinder,
Kirche, Kueche, (children, church and kitchen). First
during the competition to lead the Christian Democrat
Party and then during the real election campaign,
she fought against much residual prejudice without
ever loosing the calm attitude of a person who does
not fear difficulties; this is one of her strong points.
When the time came to form her great coalition with
the Social Democrats, Angela Merkel insisted on taking
an unprecedented number of women along with her to
the government; Ursula Van der Leyen stands out among
them. She is a lawyer with seven children who better
than anyone else embodies the role of the woman who
successfully combines political activities and family
life. If, till last year, it was deemed that Germany
was hanging behind, compared to other leading European
countries, concerning the public role of women, now
it is avant-garde. But the entire continent is rapidly
changing face. Half the Spanish government - a quarter
century ago the country could even have been called
obscurantist - numbers women and the media believe
that Zapatero's deputy, Maria Teresa Fernandez de
la Vega, is more influential than the prime minister
himself. In France, Ségolène Royal,
a woman (not even married) and mother of four children
is aiming - backed by a good portion of the Party's
ranks - at becoming the Socialist Party's official
candidate at the next presidential elections. She
is meeting with so much horizontal approval that some
surveys even declare that she has an advantage on
the probable Gaullist candidate Nicolas Sarkozy. For
the French too, a woman on the Elysian fields would
be an absolute novelty, so much so that her rivals
for the candidacy have not failed to be ironic concerning
the difficulties she would have to face in handling
both the state and the family. It is however rather
odd that the French, who are disaffected as few other
Europeans towards the politique politicienne, appreciate
the novelty to the point of accepting from Mrs. Royal
innovative and politically unfair stands that would
have sunk a man by now.
| 
|
| Ségolène
Royal |
With Margaret Thatcher, winner of three consecutive
elections, prime minister for eleven years and especially
credited for the British miracle, Great Britain was
in some way the forerunner of female progress in Europe.
The "Iron Lady" did not only dominate her
country's political scene by confining her male colleagues
to supporting roles, but she also has the credit of
having reversed the entire continent's economic trends
by encouraging the success of liberism on statism,
which prevailed in the '60s and '70s. Besides she
was too much of an anomalous figure to leave heirs,
and all three British parties are once again led by
men today. But Blair, keeping the revolution in mind,
in turn inserted a large one third of women in his
team, numbering Margaret Beckett, the first woman
in history to be the prestigious Minister of Foreign
Affairs. Scandinavian countries have always been ahead
of others. Absolute equality of the sexes had already
been achieved on various occasions both in the Parliaments
and in the division of the ministries. For the past
five years Finland has had a woman president (Tarja
Hanonen), Norway has had a woman leader of government
(Gro Harlem Brundtland) and Sweden should have one
very soon. Some half-jockingly theorise that in twenty
years there will be no discussion on the pink quota,
but rather on the blue one in those regions to make
some room for men. Sociologists tend to explain the
trend with the considerable support the State has
given women who have wanted to be deeply involved
in work during the first half of the past century,
but this trend is probably also rooted in history.
The equality of sexes in politics is extending from
Scandinavia to neighbouring Baltic countries, while
progress is rather slow in the rest of former communist
Europe and even more so in Russia. Lastly the female
presence in the European Commission, which is steadily
increasing from one quinquennium to the next, is rather
significant as if it were a general thermometer of
the situation. We have already had female commissioners
of almost every nationality, including Emma Bonino,
who has so far been the only Italian woman in this
organ. If then we move out of the European framework,
we will find quite a few surprises. Latin America
made an impressive quality leap last year with the
election of Michelle Bachelet, another single woman
with three children she had from three different men,
as president of Chile: till then the only cases had
been Isabelita Peron, who was elected president of
Argentina not through personal merit, but only because
she was Juan's widow, and Violeta Barrios de Chamorro,
president of Nicaragua for a five year period after
the Sandinist spell, which led the country into conflict
with the United States. Not satisfied, Bachelet, a
physician, has also inserted 50 per cent of women
in her government, though their role in society is
clearly inferior. We shall now wait and see whether
from Chile, which is under many respects the most
"European" of South American countries,
the trend will also extend beyond the borders. A few
months ago we witnessed another "first time"
with the victory of Mrs. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, an
almost seventy year old woman and former executive
of the World Bank, in the Liberian presidential elections.
| 
|
| Angela Merkel |
She is the first African woman to achieve this. Those
who know Subsaharian Africa's social structure will
recognise the special event, which results from both
western influence and the early stages of the evolution
of customs, which could - in perspective - subvert
millenary traditions. We must however say that for
now Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is rara avis in gurgite
vasto [a rare bird in an immense sea]: there are no
other women in the rest of the black continent who
can make a bid for power; besides the growing Muslim
influence, which is gradually expanding from north
to south, both along its Attic and Indian Ocean banks,
will make their task difficult. In fact Muslim countries,
especially the Arab ones, are the last real bulwarks
of male chauvinism. The mere idea that Egypt, Syria
or even the new Iraq could ever be guided by women
is a pure flight of imagination today; on the contrary,
we must fear that the success of extremist trends
could make the fair sex even lose the progress it
has achieved with such effort in recent decades. The
only women who have even temporarily reached the leadership
of Muslim countries so far are Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan
and Megawathi Sukarno in Indonesia, but they have
done so only by hereditary right. In fact both are
daughters and heirs of leading political men who had
remarkable popular support and it is thanks to their
respective fathers' prestige that they triumphed at
the polls. On the other hand throughout Asia family
bonds often project women towards political leadership.
It is, for instance, rather unlikely that Indira Gandhi,
who long dominated the Indian political scene and
proved to be a worthy statistician, would ever have
become Prime Minister if she had not been the daughter
of Pandit Nehru; and, her daughter-in-law, the Italian
Sonia Maino, would never have played a leading role
in the State if she had not been Rajiv's widow and
the only member of the family who could accept its
heritage. The same applies to Sirimavo Bandaranaike
who became president of Sri Lanka in 1959 substituting
her husband who was murdered, and her daughter Chandrika
Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, who succeeded the mother
thirty years later and is still in office. Concerning
Bangladesh, in the past decade the political battle
has been between Khaleda Zia, widow of former president
Ziaur Rahman, and Hasina Wazed, daughter of the "father
of the homeland" Sheikh Mujib; they take it in
turns to head the government depending on the outcome
of elections.
The Philippines are a stronghold of "pink power",
but here too women did not always reach the top only
through personal merit. Corazon Aquino succeeded Ferdinando
Marcos in 1986 only because she was the widow of Benigno,
the opposition leader, whose murder was ordered by
the dictator; then, the current president Gloria Arroyo
would never have become Number One if she did not
belong to one of the leading families of the archipelago.
Today's great unknown factor is the future of women
in politics in East Asia's three major countries:
China, Japan and South Korea, whose cultural traditions
are not particularly encouraging but which, as the
homeland of one fourth of mankind, can considerably
influence the rest of the world.
It is true that China's recent history boasts an empress,
Tzu-Shi, who played a leading role in good and bad
times, but it is equally true that, since the Communist
Party rose to power in 1948, the only woman who really
meant something was Mao's third wife, Chang Ching,
who inspired the famous "group of four".
Otherwise there are just a few ministers, but inserted
in a pattern, which guarantees male prevalence. Japan,
which is doubtless the Asian country that is most
open to western influence, has done no better. The
Socialist Party had a woman leader, Mrs. Sugawa, for
some time, but they hurriedly got rid of her after
the first defeat at the election polls. The Liberal
Democratic Party, which has ruled the country since
World War 2 with just one interruption, has only one
woman in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mrs. Tanaka
who is in turn daughter and political heir of a former
prime minister.
We can complete the survey by adding that remote,
but highly developed New Zealand has so far been the
only country in the world to have had two women prime
ministers elected consecutively: the conservative
Jenny Shipley in 1997 and the member of the Labour
Party Helen Clark in 1999.
Italy doubtless seems a long way behind in this scene.
Though there have been women ministers since the dawn
of the Republic, only few have left a lasting mark
and none (with the partial exception of Mrs. Bonino)
have ever been leaders of an important party. The
local situation is a little better with two regional
presidents on twenty (Presso in Piedmont and Lorenzetti
in Umbria) and a certain number of mayors in leading
cities (i.e. Ms. Moratti in Milan and Ms. Russo-Jervolino
in Naples). Foreign influence could however change
things rather soon, but not by decree: women themselves
must overcome their reluctance and commit themselves
deeply as Americans and Scandinavians do.
Livio
Caputo